{Solved}- 3-1 Journal: Benchmarking and Risk Analysis
Targets
Chapman (2018) explained that coding
audits could be prospective (reviewing pre-billed claims), retrospective
(reviewing submitted claims), targeted, random, or full-record analyses. Based
on her research, prospective coding audits are carefully timed to avoid
negative impacts on a facility’s accounts receivable and also to offer an
immediate learning opportunity. On the other hand, retrospective coding audits
lead to corrections that cause learning delays and require claims rebilling
(Chapman, 2018). Based on Chapman, once a facility determines whether to
undertake retrospective or prospective coding audits, the next step entails
identifying the auditing goals and the chart type targets for coding audits.
Brownfield and Didier
(2009) explained that coding auditors use audit goals to determine review chart
types. Besides, high-risk diagnostic-related groups (DRGs) and case mix index
data can also be utilized to identify chart types for review and to direct
coding audit undertakings (Brownfield & Didier, 2009).
Click to view the full document!
View Document