[Solved]- FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND INVESTMENT MN7022
Financial Analysis and Investment
Section 1: Alternative Asset Pricing Models
1.0.
Introduction
Shareholders prefer
risk-based pricing models, especially if they are pursuing a mean-variance
portfolio analysis (Pástor and Stambaugh, 2000). When there is a linear blend
of exposures to the constant risk factors, then the risky part of the
mean-variance portfolio will entail the constant benchmark portfolios that copy
those sources of risk. While applying this principle, shareholders face various
issues, which might be solved by the alternative pricing models. In risk-based
models, asset characteristics that are not related to the risk exposures are
categorised under the expected returns because of behavioural occurrences such
as failure to determine benchmark portfolios as well as overreaction (Pástor
and Stambaugh, 2000). Furthermore, shareholders encounter constraints on short
sales and borrowing to a certain level.
This report provides a
critical discussion of the alternative asset pricing models: the Capital Asset
Pricing Model (CAPM) and the Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT). It will also
provide a synthesis of the cons and pros of each model based on the underlying
theories and relevant literature. CAPM marks the birth of asset-pricing theory
and provides a powerful means to predict risk measures and the relationship
between market risk beta and the expected portfolio return (Fama and French, 2003;
Khudoykulov, 2020). On the
other hand, APT frameworks clarify the expected hypothetical rate of return of
a portfolio in equilibrium as a linear function of the risk of the portfolio,
especially in regards to the factors that capture the systematic risk (Celik, 2012).
In other words, according to Wei (1988), CAPM emphasizes the covariance between
the endogenous market portfolio and asset returns while APT stresses the
significance of the covariance between the exogenous risk and asset returns.
Click to view the full document!
View Document