[Solved]-MN7024 Financial Modelling Report
The Relationship
between the Salary of CEOs and Firm performance
1.0.
Introduction
The debate of the Chief Executive
Officers (CEOs) being exorbitantly paid is not new in corporate settings.
Stockholders expect the CEOs with high payment packages to perform higher and
prove their worth. According to Tariq (2010), the average CEO payment package
is approximately 209 times higher than that of a typical United States factory
employee. Despite certain nations like Japan and Germany bridging the gap with
an approximated difference of about 20 and 25 times respectively, there is
still significant disparity differences between the two employee groups. Usually,
the salary of the chief executive officer is linked to individual performance
and it is argued that their high compensation is justified with their
expertise. However, recent developments in corporate settings have shown an
exponential increase in the CEO compensation at all pay levels regardless of
their performance (Satyavelu, 2012).
The available literature suggests that
the high CEO compensation packages are largely based on accounting performance
measures (Aduda, 2011). Aduda (2011) further explains that there are some
relationships between stock-based compensations and accounting performance
measures in various organisations since the available stock awards each year
are often based on the organisation s annual accounting performance measures.
Furthermore, Steyn (2015) notes that shareholders pay the CEOs higher
compensation packages to attract and retain outstanding executives and also to
motivate them towards improved organisational performance. Based on literature
research, this should increase the stockholder value and in turn contribute to
a nation s economy through increased job creation and taxes (Steyn, 2015). However,
this justification of the high CEO salaries only diverts public attention from
the real issue (Jensen & Murphy, 2010).
Click to view the full document!
View Document